Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Attrition in CPF

 Attrition in CPF
18:44 IST
           PIB Press Release

        The details of  attrition in Central Para-Military Forces are as under:-

Force
Male/Female

Year
2007
2008
2009
2010 (upto 30.6.10)
Assam Rifles
M
F
2270
-
1179
-
1492
-
474
-
BSF
M
F
3609
   06
4845
04
7755
06
2099
01
CISF
M
F
1605
   26
1916
43
2515
79
1382
35
CRPF
M
F
5108
   79
5504
101
7562
87
3478
44
ITBP
M
F
 440
  04
586
05
978
05
364
01
SSB
M
F
885
-
796
-
1218
     03
257
      01


            The main reasons for attrition are superannuation, retirement, removal from service on account of disciplinary proceedings, death or disability, resignation and voluntary retirement. However, the main reasons for leaving of their job by Force personnel are:-

i)   Family/Personal/Domestic problems.
ii)  Separation from family for long duration.
iii)  Difficult duties in remote or hard  areas.
iv) Sickness /Mental depression/Psychiatric /emotional cases
v)  Fear of punishment for wrong doings.
vi) Attractive alternative employment.
vii) After the 6th CPC, the qualifying service for full pension has been reduced.

(e):       The following steps have been taken:-

i)          Transparent leave policy.
ii)          Regular interaction, both formal and informal between Commanders / officers and
            troops.
iii)         Revamping of grievances redressal machinery.

-2-

iv)         Provision of telephone facilities to the troops to facilitate being in touch with family
             members and to reduce tension in remote  locations.
v)         Increased Risk and Hardship allowance.
vi)         Yoga classes for better stress management.
vii)        Recreational and sports facilities.
viii) Basic amenities/facilities for troops and their families.
ix)         Better medical facilities.

This was stated by the Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Shri Ajay Maken in written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha today.

****
RS/KKA

Directorate of Currency set up in Ministry of Finance to Monitor and Review Efficacy of Existing Security features in Currency Notes

 Directorate of Currency set up in Ministry of Finance
to Monitor and Review Efficacy of Existing Security features in Currency Notes

17:17 IST
 PIB Release


The Directorate of Currency has been set up in the Ministry of Finance as a permanent body to monitor and review the efficacy of the existing security features in the currency notes, study best practices prevailing in other countries, drive and fund research and Development (R&D) on continuous basis and act as a clearing house on research on the subject. Setting up of the Directorate will result in development of indigenous security features for bank notes apart from faster indigenization of other inputs and continuous R&D in related field.

The steps taken by the Government to curb circulation of FICN in the country include stepping up of vigilance by the Border Security Force and Custom authorities to prevent smuggling of fake notes; dissemination of information on security features through print and electronic media and formation of Gorged Note Vigilance Cells in all the Head Offices of the banks. Additional security features have also been incorporate in the bank notes in 2005 to make counterfeiting very difficult. To strengthen the security of bank notes further, incorporation of latest security features is underway. A high Level Committee headed by the Union Home Secretary comprising officials from central agencies and other senior police officials has been constituted to monitor and draw a comprehensive strategy to combat FICN. Similar bodies have also been set up in the States. In addition, Government of India have nominated the Central Bureau of Investigation as the Nodal Agency to monitor investigation of fake currency note cases. The RBI has also strengthened the mechanism for detection of counterfeit notes by the Banks.

This information was given by the Minister of State for Finance, Shri Namo NarainMeena in written reply to an Unstarred Question in Rajya Sabha today.

DSM/PLS/S-262/10

MP Cong files sedition case against Jha for his remarks against BSF

Bhopal, Aug 3 The Madhya Pradesh Congress has filed a sedition case against state BJP President Prabhat Jha for his controversial remarks on paramilitary forces.

"On behalf of the party, I have filed a sedition petition against Jha under sections 200 and 156 (3) of the CrPC and 124 (a) of the IPC in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), R G Singh here yesterday," Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee Spokesman, J P Dhanopia told PTI today.

The next hearing in the case is fixed on August 16.

According to media reports, Jha had termed the Border Security Force and Central Reserve Police Force jawans as "dacoits" during his visit to Indore on August 1.

In the petition, Dhanopia said that since BSF and CRPF were constituted under a law of Parliament, Jha's utterances describing the jawans as "dacoits" amounted to treason and demanded action against him.
- (Agencies)
Aug 03, 2010

Curfew defied in Kupwara, Trehgam

From Greater Kashmir

Protesters ransack security posts

Shahid Rafiq

Lastupdate at : Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:40:28 IST

Kupwara: Thousands of people are defying curfew in Kupwara town and the villages along the Kupwara-Chowkibal Road leading to the Line of Control. 

So far, one post of the Border Security Force (BSF) has been ransacked while a Water Filtration Plant occupied and used by paramilitray CRPF has been damaged. 

Army is now assisting the CRPF and Police in containing the demonstrations. Army personnel also opened fire in the air at several places along the road to disperse the protesters. 

There are no reports of any casualties so far. 

Meanwhile, around 20,000 people have descended on Shumnag village from surrounding villages of Kralpora where a youth was killed in firing yesterday

Disperse crowds in Kashmir but banish the bullet, say experts

From Sify.com

2010-08-02 18:50:00
Can Kashmir find its way out of the vicious cycle of protests and police firings that has seen 36 civilians being killed in six weeks? Yes, say outraged experts and rights activists who wonder why security forces haven't used non-lethal methods like rubber bullets and water cannons to disperse protesters in the valley.
A milder response by security forces and the use of internationally accepted ways of dispersing crowds would have reduced civilian killings and helped rein in tensions that have once again put Kashmir in the international spotlight is the widely held view.
'I do not think at any occasion in recent times has firing by security forces been warranted,' said E.N. Rammohan, former Border Security Forces (BSF) chief and head of the commission that probed the Maoist attack in Chhattisgarh's Dantewada region in April.
'Kashmir needs better policing not repeated firing. An effective lathi-charge, teargas shelling or the use of water cannons could have been better than the bullet firings.'
Rammohan, who had worked in Kashmir during the peak of militancy in the mid 1990s, added: 'If you abide by international practices, the administration is supposed to deploy baton squads with shields to tackle rioting mobs or stone-pelting protesters.
'Firing is not permitted unless security forces are fired upon or their lives are endangered. Even if you fire, it should be at the legs, not above the chest.'
Of the 36 people, most of them teenagers and youths, killed during protests since June 11, 29 died in police firing. Four of them Monday.
'Police, paramilitary forces and the army have to evolve a new strategy to avoid excessses while dealing with protests,' said Jammu and Kashmir Congress chief Saifuddin Soz. 'The aim should be not to kill while controlling mob protests,' Soz told IANS.
Stressing the use of water cannons and bullets, he said security forces should be given refresher courses how to deal with street protests and stone-pelters.
Human rights organisations have also criticised the 'excess use of force' by security personnel in Kashmir.
'It is clear security forces are not at all equipped to deal with crowd control. If law enforcement agencies start firing on the protesters, it will ignite more anger amongst the people. It will build a momentum for another round of protests and violence,' Suhas Chakma, director of the Asian Centre for Human Rights, told IANS.
Security agencies, he said, should use rubber bullets instead of live bullets. The criminal procedure code (CrPC) and the UN code of conduct prohibits security personnel from shooting any protester above the waist, Chakma pointed out.
'People will protest in a democracy. These protests can take place in any other city of India. But that doesn't mean that security forces should use live bullets to contain the crowd.'
Adding to the chorus of protest, Gautam Kaul, former director general of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), said the formation of peace committees comprising prominent citizens, social activists and community leaders was the need of the hour.
He was critical of the methodology of the police action in Kashmir. 'I do not see any riot drill undertaken by the police. Instead, there is a formation of uniformed uniformed groups, engaged loosely,' Kaul, himself a Kashmiri, added.
Forget about bullets, even rubber bullets should not be fired at close range, he said.
Muhammed Yusuf Tarigami, legislator and state secretary of the Communist Party of India-Marxist, told IANS over the phone that 'coordinated panels of the police and the security forces' should be formed at all levels so that the bloodshed is stopped.
'They are not the traditional AK-47 wielding militants. But a new group of stone-pelting youngsters. With the media spreading its network, forces should know that the entire world is watching what they do,' Tarigami said.
All About: National

Bike engines smuggled to run Bangla boats

From The Telegraph
Shillong, Aug. 2: Smuggling of jazzy bikes to Bangladesh from Meghalaya has become a lucrative business for a gang operating along the border the hill state shares with the neighbouring country.
The border, earlier used for carrying contraband, is now also used to smuggle Pulsar, Bajaj 100cc and Yamaha RX 100 to Bangladesh where the engines of the bikes are removed to ply motorboats.
India does not export bikes to Bangladesh which imports the two-wheelers from Japan and North Korea. Earlier, bikes from the northeastern states, except Assam and Bangladesh, were smuggled to Myanmar to make motorboats.
Incidents of theft of at least 50 bikes till July this year from the border areas of Meghalaya have lent credence to the suspicion that there is a thriving nexus between the border criminals in Meghalaya and those in Bangladesh who are engaged in smuggling of bikes.
“We had arrested a few Bangladeshi bike-lifters a few months back and their confessions revealed that the bikes’ engines are used in the mechanised boats,” the superintendent of police, West Garo Hills, Dalton Marak, said.
The arrests of two Bangladeshi nationals — Santa Koch, alias Sarna, 32, and Kanchan Koch, 22 — in May this year have blown the lid off a thriving bike-smuggling racket.
Mahendraganj police with the help of the residents of Chibong Bongre village in West Garo Hills district apprehended the duo at Chibong Bongre village. The bike (registration number ML-09-7718) seized was stolen by them from Haldibari village in West Garo Hills border.
Their confessions revealed that engines removed from the bikes are used to make motorboats in Bangladesh. Confirming this, the BSF and Meghalaya police said the engines with good mileage come handy for making motorboats.
A manager of a bike showroom here said engines of Pulsar can be easily fixed to motorboats. According to the police, engines of Pulsar consume less petrol.
The criminals from Meghalaya border earn more than Rs 10,000 per motorcycle engine, according to the police.
The BSF had foiled attempts to smuggle bikes to Bangladesh on six occasions this year.
On April 27, the BSF deployed in Garo hills had spotted two persons pushing a bike towards the Bangladesh side from Dalu in West Garo Hills.
The smugglers, however, escaped, leaving behind the motorcycle.
The public relations officer of the BSF, Ravi Gandhi, also confirmed reports of bike engines being used in the motorboats in Bangladesh.
According to the BSF, most of the bikes intercepted were stolen from Tura and nearby areas.
“It appears that there is an organised gang of vehicle-lifters in West Garo Hills that has access to Bangladesh,” the BSF said.
West Khasi Hills, bordering Bangladesh, has also become a safe haven for bike smugglers.
“We had busted a racket in West Khasi Hills border. The gang comprised Garos from Bangladesh. They were also engaged in stealing bikes among other crimes,” West Khasi Hills superintendent of police, M. Kharkrang, said.
A gang led by one Kala Mia was busted in Borosora, West Khasi Hills, on July 6.
The criminals steal the bikes from the hilly areas of the district and drive down to the Bangladesh border to sell them , the SP said.
Once the bikes reach Bangladesh, there are operatives and mechanics who remove the engines for use in the motorboats.
Concerned over the rise in incidents of bike theft, Meghalaya police want the bike owners to keep the two-wheelers in safe custody.

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Sigh Of Relief For Many


From Outlook Money

Revised Direct tax Code not to tax maturity savings


The way we save for our long-term financial needs may not see the sea-change we expected when the Union government had announced the Original Direct Taxes Code (ODTC) Bill proposals in August 2009. The new code will eventually replace the Income Tax Act, 1961. The revised proposals of the DTC, released recently by the finance ministry, paint a somewhat different picture for the taxpayers. Though clarity on various aspects is still some way off, let’s take a look at the impact of the Revised DTC (RDTC).

EEE Tax status
Original DTC. While the RDTC Bill has not proposed anything adventurous—unlike the ODTC Bill—it still has provisions for tax-saving investments, with the limit staying put at Rs 3 lakh per annum under Section 66 of the proposed DTC. According to the ODTC, you would have been allowed to invest only in accounts maintained by any of the four permitted intermediaries—provident funds, superannuation funds, life insurers and the New Pension System (NPS)—and claim tax exemption at the contribution stage. Any accretions were tax exempt, but withdrawals or maturity proceeds were to be taxed.
Revised DTC. Under RDTC, the Public Provident Fund (PPF), Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) or any other provident fund proceeds continue to be tax-free. In addition, NPS, proceeds of pure life insurance products and annuity products, too, would be tax-free and get the EEE (exempt-exempt-exempt) status for taxation, i.e., exemption in the year of contribution, during the period of investment and at the time of maturity. This should give pension products a reason to shine brightly in one’s financial portfolio.
Retirement Planning
The revised draft aims to harmonise all savings products based on their holding period and boost long-term savings. It says: “To achieve the objective of long-term savings, the rules for contribution, as well as withdrawal, will be harmonised and made uniform so that such savings are actually made and utilised by the taxpayer for the long term.” This implies that insurance products, such as endowment, moneyback or Ulips, move into the exempt-exempt-taxable (EET) regime. However, there isn’t enough clarity on this.
Existing Investments
The revised proposals have brought about clarity as far as existing investments are concerned. The draft says that investments made before the date of commencement of the DTC in instruments which enjoy the EEE method of taxation under the current law would continue to be treated in the same way for their full duration.
Retirement Account
Original DTC. Under the ODTC, employees were supposed to put all their retirement benefits, such as gratuity or VRS proceeds, in a retirement benefit account (RBA) with any of the four permitted savings intermediaries to avail tax exemption. Any withdrawal would have been taxed.
Revised DTC. Under the RDTC, the concept of RBA itself has been scrapped. All retirement benefits continue to be exempt, subject to limits.
House Property
Original DTC. As of now, if you have a second property, even if its lying vacant, it is taxed under the premise of being ‘deemed to be on rent’. The basis of the tax is the notional rent. Those who have not rented it out still have to pay the tax. The ODTC suggested its taxation would be based on the gross rental income, which would be higher of the actual rent or a presumptive rent of 6 per cent of the value as set by the authorities.
Revised DTC. RDTC allows the gross rent to be the actual rent received. So, if a property which is not actually rented out and is vacant, the gross rent will be nil and the owner wouldn’t have to pay any tax. However, if the house property is self-occupied, you will be eligible for annual deduction on account of the interest on the capital borrowed for its acquisition or construction, subject to a ceiling of Rs 1.5 lakh a year, from the gross total income. This comes a big relief for several home loan takers.

The New Tax Regime
* Deduction at a specified percentage of capital gains. To qualify as long term, the period has to be more than a year from the end of the financial year in which asset was acquired

Capital Gains
Original DTC. The DTC does not distinguish between short- and long-term capital gains. Currently, if you sell units of equity-oriented mutual funds after a year, you don’t need to pay any capital gains tax. But as per the original direct tax code proposals, you would need to pay tax when you sell your MFs—be it equity or debt. The gains get added to your income and taxed as per your income slab. However, in case of gains made above one year, the code will allow you an indexation benefit. Indexation is a facility offered by the income-tax laws to adjust your security’s cost price for inflation over the years. This enables you to inflate your cost price in order to reduce the difference between your selling price and cost price. The lower this difference, the lower is your tax liability. For investments such as gold, gold ETFs and real estate less than one year-old, the capital gains will be added to the taxable income while those more than a year old will see the gains getting adding to the taxable income after adjusting for indexation benefit.
Revised DTC. On long-term capital gains (LTCG) on equity shares and equity funds, the RTDC removes the indexation benefit. Instead, it introduces a concept of certain specified deduction from the capital gains, depending on the holding period of the investment. Once the gains are reduced after deducting a percentage, it gets added to your income and, then, taxed as per the slab. What if one is holding units of MFs or listed equity shares for a long period? Selling them in post-DTC era would surely call for tax. The natural instinct will be to sell them before the D-day of 1 April 2011 and, then, maybe buy it again the next day. The government is aware of this and, so, as per the revised draft, it says: “As there will be a shift from nil rate of tax on listed equity shares and units of equity oriented funds held for more than one year, an appropriate transition regime will be provided, if required.”
STCG on equity shares and equity funds. On short-term capital gains, there will be no indexation and deduction benefits and all gains will be added to income and taxed accordingly. So, instead of the current 15 per cent applicable for all, lower tax-slab individuals stand to gain by paying 10 per cent under the new DTC rules. The concept of holding period is the second big change proposed. At present, holding the capital asset for 365 days or more qualifies it as long-term. As per RDTC, capital asset held for a period of more than a year from the end of financial year in which it was acquired will qualify as long-term. This period may go up to 730 days now.
LTCG on other assets. On LTCG on all other capital assets other than shares and equity funds, i.e., gold, real estate, debt funds and ETFs, there won’t be any benefit of specified deduction. Here, the time period for qualifying as an asset as long-term has been reduced from three years to one year. The gains will get indexation benefit.
STCG on other assets. On short-term gains from such assets, gains will be added to income fully, without deduction or indexation benefit.